一、前言#
隨著生成式人工智慧（如 ChatGPT）的迅速發展，學術寫作正變得更加智能和高效。高品質的學術論文不僅能夠準確傳達研究成果，也會在學術圈內帶來更廣泛的影響力。借助 GPT 等工具，研究者能夠更輕鬆地完善行文邏輯、豐富語言表達，並在多次迭代中不斷打磨出更具說服力和可讀性的學術文本。
本手冊的目的是為讀者整理一系列常用的提示詞（Prompts），幫助在學術寫作與審稿過程中更好地與 GPT 協作。通過精心設計和分類的提示詞示例，筆者希望為研究者提供一份快捷、實用的參考指南，使其在撰寫和潤色論文、進行同行評審輔助以及編輯反饋優化等方面都能有效地提升寫作效率與質量。
二、學術寫作提示詞#
學術寫作潤色#
本章將圍繞學術寫作中最常見的潤色需求，給出詳細且專業的提示詞（Prompts）。這些提示詞覆蓋了語法、邏輯、風格、特定期刊要求等多個方面，幫助研究者在不同層面打磨論文。以下所有 Prompt 同時提供中文和英文版本，並盡量在同一段中一次性說明清楚需求，便於 GPT 完整理解並輸出高品質結果。
句法與語法精修#
複雜句與主被動語態轉換#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名資深的學術寫作與語言潤色專家，請協助我優化以下文本中的句子結構：在保證學術嚴謹度的前提下，減少冗長或不必要的從句，必要時將主動語態與被動語態靈活轉換，以使整段文字既保持專業水準，又具有更好的可讀性和流暢度。請注意在處理複雜句時，避免過度簡化關鍵學術內容，同時確保邏輯清晰、表意準確。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced academic writing and language editing specialist, please help me improve the sentence structure in the following text. While maintaining scholarly rigor, reduce overly long or unnecessary subordinate clauses, and appropriately switch between active and passive voice for better readability and coherence. When handling complex sentences, avoid oversimplifying critical academic content, ensuring logical clarity and precise meaning.”
主謂一致與時態一致#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名具備高級語法審校能力的學術寫作顧問，請在審閱下列文本時重點關注主謂一致和時態使用是否正確。若發現引言與結論應使用一般現在時、方法與結果應使用一般過去時的場合，請幫助進行相應調整，並對不符合主謂一致原則的句子進行改寫。請在保持學術語氣的同時，保證行文自然流暢。”
【English Prompt】
“As an advanced grammar reviewer specializing in academic writing, please focus on ensuring subject-verb agreement and correct tense usage in the following text. Where necessary, adjust the tense to present simple for the introduction and conclusion, and past tense for methods and results. Also revise any sentences that do not follow proper subject-verb agreement. Maintain a formal academic tone while ensuring the text remains clear and fluent.”
標點符號與拼寫檢查#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名資深語言編輯，請幫助我檢查下列學術文本的標點符號和拼寫是否規範。請注意逗號、分號、破折號以及引號的正確用法，並確保不存在錯別字或專業名詞拼寫錯誤。若有需要進一步澄清的術語或拼寫用法，也請提出改進建議並加以說明。”
【English Prompt】
“As a seasoned language editor, please review the punctuation and spelling of the following academic text. Pay special attention to the correct usage of commas, semicolons, em dashes, and quotation marks, and verify that there are no misspellings or incorrect professional terms. If there are ambiguous terms or spelling conventions that need clarification, please provide improvement suggestions and explanations.”
邏輯連貫性與論證結構#
段落銜接與過渡#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名專門從事論文結構優化的學術顧問，請幫助我在下列文本各段之間添加合適的過渡語句與連接詞，確保每段話題緊密相連；同時請檢查段落主題句與總結句是否充分體現核心觀點。若發現個別段落與前後文脫節或有跳躍邏輯，請提出相應修改建議，以改善整體連貫性。”
【English Prompt】
“As a consultant specializing in paper structure optimization, please help me insert appropriate transitional phrases and linking words between the paragraphs of the following text, ensuring a cohesive flow of ideas. Also check whether each paragraph’s topic sentence and concluding sentence clearly convey the main points. If you find any paragraphs disconnected from the surrounding context or containing logical leaps, propose revisions to enhance overall coherence.”
論點的展開與支持#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位資深學術寫作教練，請審核以下文本中每段提出的論點是否得到充分的數據或文獻支持。若發現論點缺乏引用或事例說明，請指出具體位置並建議補充必要的參考文獻或實例；同時幫助我優化說明性語句，以便增強說服力和可信度。”
【English Prompt】
“As a seasoned academic writing coach, please review whether each argument in the following text is sufficiently supported by data or literature. If you notice any arguments lacking citations or examples, highlight the specific locations and recommend adding the necessary references or illustrations. Also help me refine explanatory sentences to strengthen persuasiveness and credibility.”
反駁與對比論證#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名具有豐富論文審稿經驗的專家，請檢查以下文本中是否適當地對不同觀點進行闡述、比較或反駁。若論文只呈現單一立場，缺乏對立或補充性觀點的討論，請建議在何處添加對比論證或反駁段落；同時請插入合理的過渡短語，以確保正反觀點在行文中獲得平衡、有效地強化論文整體論證。”
【English Prompt】
“As an expert with extensive manuscript review experience, please verify whether the following text sufficiently presents, compares, or refutes different perspectives. If it solely advocates a single standpoint without discussing counterarguments or supplementary viewpoints, recommend where to add contrasting or rebuttal paragraphs. Also insert appropriate transitional phrases to ensure a balanced treatment of opposing views, effectively strengthening the overall argumentation of the paper.”
學術風格與專業語氣#
避免口語化表達#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名學術寫作語言風格導師，請審閱以下文本，識別並替換可能顯得口語化或隨意化的短語和詞彙，用更正式、專業且學術風格的語言加以改寫。請提供必要的替換建議，使文本既保持學術嚴謹，又具備流暢易讀的特點。”
【English Prompt】
“As a language style mentor in academic writing, please review the following text to identify and replace any colloquial or casual phrases or terms with more formal and scholarly equivalents. Provide appropriate substitution suggestions to ensure the text retains academic rigor while remaining clear and readable.”
專業術語與簡練用詞#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位對專業術語與精準表述十分敏感的高級學術編輯，請幫我審查以下文本中的專業術語使用是否恰當，並檢查是否有頻率過高、累贅或不必要的複雜詞彙。若發現可用更簡練且同樣專業的詞來替換，請給出具體建議，並保持文意準確一致。”
【English Prompt】
“As a senior academic editor with a keen eye for professional terminology and concise expression, please review the following text to determine whether specialized terms are used appropriately and whether any words are overly frequent, redundant, or unnecessarily complex. If simpler yet equally professional wording can be used, provide specific recommendations while preserving accuracy and consistency.”
引用風格與一致性#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名熟悉多種學術引用規範（如 APA、MLA、Chicago）的編輯，請幫助我檢查以下文本在引文格式、尾注或腳注方面是否符合對應的引用標準。請確保同一篇文獻在全篇使用統一的格式，並對常見失誤（例如作者姓名拼寫、年份不一致）進行校正。若發現引用信息缺失或不完整，也請提出建議。”
【English Prompt】
“As an editor well-versed in various academic citation styles (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago), please review the referencing format, endnotes, or footnotes in the following text to confirm adherence to the chosen style guidelines. Ensure that each cited source is consistently formatted, and correct common errors such as misspellings of authors’ names or inconsistent publication years. If you notice missing or incomplete citation details, please provide recommendations.”
段落與結構優化#
段落拆分與合併#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名注重文本邏輯與可讀性的學術排版專家，請幫我審閱以下段落結構，判斷哪些段落需要拆分以避免信息過載，哪些段落可合併以減少重複與冗長。請確保在段落拆分或合併後仍能維持主題連貫，並保留學術論述的完整性。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic layout specialist focused on logical flow and readability, please evaluate the paragraph structure in the following text to determine which paragraphs should be split to avoid information overload and which should be merged to reduce redundancy and length. Ensure that the text remains coherent and preserves the integrity of the academic argument after these revisions.”
章節順序與層次#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位熟悉學術論文整體結構與章節邏輯的顧問，請檢查下列文本中各章節（如引言、方法、結果、討論）的順序與層次是否合乎通常學術規範。若發現有小節不緊扣中心主題或出現跳躍式安排，請建議合理的調整方案並說明調整依據，以確保研究內容具備清晰連貫的論證脈絡。”
【English Prompt】
“As a consultant familiar with the overall structure and chapter logic of academic papers, please evaluate whether the arrangement and hierarchy of sections (e.g., Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) in the following text conform to common academic standards. If any subsections deviate from the central theme or appear disjointed, recommend a suitable reorganization strategy and explain the rationale behind it to maintain a coherent flow of arguments.”
提高可讀性的排版建議#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名專業排版與文檔設計師，請根據以下文本內容，給出能提高閱讀體驗的具體建議，例如是否使用項目符號、編號列表、表格或圖示來展示複雜信息。若有必要，請簡要說明如何利用標題層次、字體或行距設置來提升文章整體可讀性和視覺效果，但仍需保持學術文檔的嚴謹性。”
【English Prompt】
“As a professional layout and document design specialist, please suggest specific improvements to the following text that will enhance the reading experience, such as employing bullet points, numbered lists, tables, or figures to present complex information. Where necessary, briefly explain how to use heading levels, font choices, or line spacing to improve overall readability and visual appeal without compromising the academic rigor of the document.”
修辭與寫作風格打磨#
同義詞替換與詞彙多樣性#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位具有豐富詞彙庫與寫作經驗的學術潤色專家，請幫助我在以下文本中找到重複使用的關鍵詞或短語，並推薦恰當的同義詞或近義短語進行替換，以提升詞彙多樣性。請注意在替換時保持語境和學科術語的精確性，避免因用詞不當造成歧義。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic editing specialist with an extensive vocabulary and writing experience, please identify frequently repeated keywords or phrases in the following text and recommend suitable synonyms or closely related phrases to enhance lexical diversity. While replacing, ensure that the contextual meaning and disciplinary terminology remain accurate, avoiding ambiguities caused by inappropriate word choices.”
強調與弱化#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位深諳學術語氣調整的寫作教練，請在審閱以下文本時，辨別出需要進一步強調或弱化的語句。若某些論點或結論需要更強烈的語氣來突出其重要性，請提出建議；若有些表述需要放緩或謹慎處理（如不確定性、局限性部分），也請指出合適的詞彙或表達方式，以準確傳達作者對該問題的把握程度。”
【English Prompt】
“As a writing coach adept at adjusting academic tone, please review the following text to identify sentences that should be further emphasized or downplayed. If certain arguments or conclusions need a stronger expression of importance, propose suitable modifications; likewise, if some statements require more cautious or nuanced language (e.g., when addressing uncertainties or limitations), recommend appropriate words or expressions to accurately convey the author’s degree of certainty.”
語言的簡潔性#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位追求高效表達的學術寫作顧問，請幫助我在以下文本中識別並精簡赘余詞句，確保每個句子都緊扣核心主題，避免不必要的重複或華而不實的修飾。請在保證原意不受損害的前提下，對長句進行適度拆分或合併，並提供改寫示例，以提升整體的明晰度與可讀性。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic writing consultant focused on concise expression, please help me identify and eliminate superfluous phrases in the following text, ensuring each sentence addresses the core topic without unnecessary repetition or overly ornate language. While preserving the original meaning, split or merge long sentences where needed, providing rewritten examples that improve clarity and readability.”
特定學科或期刊要求#
醫學、社會科學、工程等學科寫作差異#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位熟悉多種學科寫作風格的學術編輯，請針對以下文本所在的研究領域，指出其在寫作上可能需要符合的特定規範（例如醫學類注重嚴謹的研究設計表述，社會科學類強調理論框架說明，工程類偏重技術細節等）。請幫我根據該領域的通用標準提出具體的寫作風格調整建議，以更契合該學科的慣用表達和審稿要求。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic editor familiar with various disciplinary writing styles, please identify the specific conventions that the following text should adhere to based on its field of study (e.g., rigorous methodological descriptions in medical papers, a well-defined theoretical framework in social sciences, or a focus on technical details in engineering). Offer concrete suggestions to adjust the writing style according to common practices and review criteria in that domain.”
期刊偏好與格式#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位了解不同期刊要求的論文潤色顧問，請在審閱以下文本時，考量目標期刊在字數限制、主題關注點與引用風格等方面的偏好。若發現文本長度、行文方式或參考文獻格式與該期刊要求不匹配，請給出針對性的修改方案，包括精簡段落、調整學術用語或轉換引文格式等。”
【English Prompt】
“As a paper editing consultant knowledgeable about various journal requirements, please review the following text with regard to the target journal’s word count constraints, thematic focus, and citation style preferences. If the text’s length, style, or references do not align with the journal guidelines, provide specific recommendations, such as condensing paragraphs, modifying academic language, or switching to a different citation format.”
多語言環境#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名精通多語言學術寫作的專家，請幫我檢查以下文本在中英文之間（或其他語言組合）是否存在術語或表述的不一致問題。若某些專有名詞或概念需要在譯文中精確對應，請保持統一並標註出處；若不同語言的寫作風格存在顯著差異，請提出相應的調整建議，以確保學術內容在多語言環境中呈現的準確與連貫。”
【English Prompt】
“As an expert proficient in multilingual academic writing, please help me verify whether there are any inconsistencies in terms or expressions between English and Chinese (or other language pairs) in the following text. For any specialized terminology or concepts that require precise equivalences in translation, ensure consistency and provide references. If significant stylistic differences exist between the languages, propose adjustments to maintain accuracy and coherence of the academic content across multilingual contexts.”
同行評審輔助#
在學術研究的同行評審流程中，利用 GPT 可以模擬資深專家的視角，對論文的核心內容、研究設計、方法論以及數據分析等部分進行審查和反饋。以下提示詞將幫助您快速生成高品質的同行評審意見，既能凸顯專業性，也可為作者提供切實可行的改進建議。
模擬資深專家審稿#
【中文 Prompt】
“假設您是一位在 [研究領域] 擁有 20 年學術經驗的資深專家學者，請基於我對這篇論文的簡要概述，寫出一份詳細的同行評審報告。報告應包括：1）論文的研究背景與核心貢獻；2）研究方法的合理性與科學性評價；3）數據分析或結果是否可信及其理由；4）論文目前存在的不足或局限性，並提出可行的改進建議。請保持學術專業且客觀的語氣。”
【English Prompt】
“Assume you are a seasoned scholar with 20 years of experience in the field of [Research Area]. Based on my brief summary of this paper, please draft a detailed peer review report that covers: (1) the research background and the paper’s main contributions; (2) an evaluation of the methodological rigor and scientific validity; (3) the credibility of the data analysis or results and the reasons behind your assessment; and (4) the paper’s limitations or weaknesses, along with practical suggestions for improvement. Maintain a professional and objective tone throughout.”
論文結構與論點剖析#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名對論文邏輯結構和論點展開有深入見解的專家，請對以下論文進行審閱並著重評論：1）論文的整體結構是否符合常見的學術規範；2）論點的層次是否清晰、遞進有序；3）引言、文獻綜述、方法、結果、討論等部分之間的銜接是否緊密。若有結構性的缺陷（如缺少關鍵章節或缺乏過渡段落），請具體指出並給出改進策略，以確保論文論證鏈條的完整。”
【English Prompt】
“As an expert with deep insights into the logical structure and argument development of academic papers, please review the following manuscript and focus on: (1) whether its overall structure aligns with common scholarly standards; (2) the clarity and logical progression of the arguments; and (3) the coherence among the Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. If any structural flaws (e.g., missing key sections or lacking transitional paragraphs) are identified, please specify them and propose enhancements to ensure a complete chain of reasoning.”
提升研究設計與數據分析#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名在研究設計與數據分析方面經驗豐富的同行評審專家，請幫助我評估以下論文：1）研究問題與假設是否合理且具有創新性；2）研究設計（包括實驗設計、問卷調查或數據採集方式等）是否能夠有效驗證該假設；3）數據分析方法是否恰當，統計結果是否具有足夠的信度和效度。若發現不完善之處，請提出改進或替代方案，並簡要說明原因。”
【English Prompt】
“As a peer reviewer with extensive experience in research design and data analysis, please evaluate the following paper by considering: (1) whether the research question and hypotheses are both reasonable and innovative; (2) whether the study design (including experimental setup, survey method, or data collection strategy) sufficiently addresses these hypotheses; and (3) whether the data analysis approach is appropriate and the statistical results are reliable and valid. If any shortcomings are identified, propose improvements or alternatives, providing a brief rationale.”
全面審稿意見彙總#
【中文 Prompt】
“基於對論文各方面（研究背景、文獻綜述、方法、結果、討論、參考文獻）的綜合審閱，請撰寫一份全面的同行評審意見，指出論文的亮點與貢獻之處，同時闡明需要進一步完善或修改的主要問題，並按重要程度排列。建議在每個問題後附上可能的解決方案或思路，以便作者能高效地對論文進行修訂。”
【English Prompt】
“Drawing on a comprehensive review of all aspects of the manuscript (research background, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and references), please compose a thorough peer review that highlights the paper’s strengths and contributions, while also addressing the primary issues needing further refinement or revision in order of importance. For each issue, include potential solutions or suggestions so that the authors can effectively improve their work.”
編輯反饋優化#
在學術期刊編輯或審稿人角色下，撰寫反饋信或審稿意見時，需要兼具專業性、禮貌性和指導性。以下提示詞將幫助您生成更具條理性、建設性和可讀性的反饋內容，為作者或投稿人提供清晰的修改方向。相較於其他環節，編輯反饋往往直接影響作者對論文修訂的理解與執行，因此我們在此提供更為詳盡的 Prompt，覆蓋從初步意見到最終退修或接受等多種情境。
拒稿信（Rejection Letter）#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名負責稿件初篩和終審決策的期刊編輯，請在審閱以下稿件的基礎上，起草一封拒稿信。信中需要：1）簡要概括稿件的主題和主要結論；2）指出導致拒稿的關鍵原因，如研究新穎性不足、方法不嚴謹、數據不充分或結論不夠扎實；3）保持尊重與客觀的語氣，同時給出可行的改進建議，讓作者理解如何提升後續的研究或稿件質量。”
【English Prompt】
“As a journal editor responsible for initial screening and final decisions, please draft a rejection letter based on the manuscript provided. Your letter should: (1) briefly summarize the paper’s topic and main findings; (2) identify the key reasons for rejection, such as insufficient novelty, methodological flaws, inadequate data, or weak conclusions; and (3) maintain a respectful and objective tone while offering feasible suggestions for improvement, ensuring the authors understand how to enhance their future research or submissions.”
退修意見（Major/Minor Revision Letter）#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名在學術期刊任職多年的高級編輯，請為以下稿件起草一封退修意見書，重點說明需要作者大幅（或小幅）修改的部分。請先肯定論文的優點與潛在貢獻，然後分條列出需改進的要點，包括研究設計、數據分析、文獻引用、寫作風格等具體問題，並提供指導性建議。請保持專業、鼓勵的語氣，並在結束時說明提交修訂稿的相關要求和截止日期（若適用）。”
【English Prompt】
“As a senior editor at an academic journal, please draft a major (or minor) revision letter for the following manuscript. Start by acknowledging the paper’s merits and potential contributions, then systematically enumerate the key areas requiring improvement—such as research design, data analysis, literature citations, or writing style—offering guidance on how to address these issues. Maintain a professional, encouraging tone, and conclude by outlining any requirements or deadlines for submitting the revised version, if applicable.”
接受稿件的修改建議（Acceptance with Revision Notes）#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位在同行評審與編輯環節均有豐富經驗的資深編輯，請根據以下稿件撰寫一封接收通知函。需要在文中說明該論文已達到刊發標準，但仍建議作者在正式發表前進行一些小範圍的修訂或補充，如補充某些數據分析或修正表述不清的段落。請始終保持正式且積極的語氣，鼓勵作者在發表前最終確認好所有細節和格式。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced editor involved in both peer review and editorial processes, please write an acceptance letter for the following manuscript. Indicate that the paper meets the publication criteria but advise the authors to make minor revisions or additions before final publication, such as refining certain data analyses or clarifying ambiguous statements. Maintain a formal yet positive tone, encouraging the authors to finalize all details and formatting prior to publication.”
審稿意見整合與附加說明#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名期刊編輯，需要針對審稿人 A、審稿人 B、審稿人 C 給出的不同意見進行整合，並向作者出具一份綜合反饋。請在以下文檔中：1）總結三位審稿人的主要肯定與質疑點；2）指出作者應優先處理的問題；3）強調編輯部的最終立場或決定，如需要大修 / 小修、或暫時搁置等；4）在給作者的行文中保持一致的語氣和格式，避免作者因為審稿意見不一致而產生混淆。請注意禮貌、客觀和建設性。”
【English Prompt】
“As a journal editor, you need to consolidate the comments from Reviewer A, Reviewer B, and Reviewer C into a single unified response for the authors. Please do the following in the document: (1) summarize the main points of agreement and contention among the three reviewers; (2) highlight the issues the authors should address first; (3) state the editorial office’s final stance or decision, such as major/minor revisions or a provisional hold; and (4) maintain a consistent tone and format to minimize any confusion arising from divergent reviewer opinions. Remember to stay polite, objective, and constructive.”
針對作者的建設性引導與鼓勵#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名致力於幫助作者不斷提升論文質量的編輯，請撰寫一封具有引導意義的反饋信。在信中除批注問題外，還需要：1）具體說明如何利用期刊的資源（如模板、格式指南等）進行修改；2）鼓勵作者在後續研究中加強與其他學科或領域的跨學科合作；3）提示作者可以在論文的附錄或補充材料中提供更多數據或圖表，以增強論文的整體說服力。請保持積極、友善的編輯語氣，讓作者對後續修訂充滿信心。”
【English Prompt】
“As an editor committed to helping authors continually improve their manuscripts, please compose a feedback letter that serves as a guiding document. In addition to pointing out issues, the letter should: (1) specify how to utilize journal resources (e.g., templates, formatting guidelines) for revisions; (2) encourage cross-disciplinary collaboration in future research; and (3) suggest the inclusion of additional data or figures in appendices or supplementary materials to strengthen the paper’s overall impact. Maintain a positive, supportive editorial tone that instills confidence in the authors’ revision process.”
最終決定說明（如：接受、拒絕後重投等）#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為期刊主編，請針對以下稿件撰寫一份最終決定說明，包括對作者的致謝、對審稿人投入的肯定，以及對該稿件目前處理狀態（如直接接受、拒絕後允許重新投稿、或無限期搁置）的簡要解釋。若是拒絕後重投的情況，請附上具體的重新提交條件或改進方向；若是直接接受，則可以在文末提示作者如何完善校樣或準備封面圖 / 摘要等必要附加材料。”
【English Prompt】
“As the editor-in-chief of the journal, please draft a statement detailing the final decision for the following manuscript, including expressions of gratitude to the authors and acknowledgement of the reviewers’ contributions, as well as a brief explanation of the current status (e.g., outright acceptance, rejection with an option to resubmit, or indefinite deferral). If the decision is a ‘reject but resubmit,’ include specific guidelines or directions for resubmission; if the paper is accepted outright, add a reminder at the end for authors to finalize proofs or prepare any required supplementary materials (e.g., cover images, abstracts).”
三、 其他常見高頻提示詞#
本章將介紹除學術寫作潤色、同行評審與編輯反饋之外，在學術論文寫作流程中經常會用到的其他類型高頻提示詞，包括多語言翻譯、文獻總結與引用，以及論文整體結構與組織等方面。通過以下提示詞，研究者可以快速生成更準確、規範的學術文本，並進一步優化論文整體質量。
學術論文翻譯#
隨著全球化學術交流的日益頻繁，多語言環境下的準確溝通顯得至關重要。以下提示詞可幫助作者或譯者在不同語言之間進行高品質的學術翻譯，並保持術語一致性、語氣嚴謹及文化適配性。
術語一致性與專業表達#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名熟悉 [研究領域] 專業術語的學術翻譯專家，請幫助我對以下文本進行準確的翻譯和潤色。請確保所有關鍵術語在整個文本中保持一致，並使用在該領域得到廣泛接受的標準化表達方式。如果發現已有譯文不夠專業或存有歧義，請提供更恰當的替換詞或句式，並標明原因。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic translation specialist with expertise in [Research Field] terminology, please assist me in accurately translating and refining the following text. Ensure that all key terms remain consistent throughout, using standardized expressions widely recognized in the field. If any existing translations appear unprofessional or ambiguous, propose more suitable alternatives or phrasing and explain why they are preferable.”
句子結構與文化背景#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位了解多語言文化差異並具備學術寫作經驗的翻譯顧問，請幫助我將以下英文（或其他語言）內容翻譯為中文時，注意句子結構和行文習慣的差異。若原文有長句或被動語態過多，請酌情進行分句或改寫；同時確保在跨文化背景下，不改變核心學術觀點的準確性與完整性。若某些概念在中文語境中需要補充註釋，請一並說明。”
【English Prompt】
“As a translation consultant versed in cross-cultural differences and academic writing, please help me convert the following English (or other language) content into Chinese, taking into account structural and stylistic nuances. If the source text contains overly long or passive constructions, consider splitting or rephrasing sentences. Make sure the original academic concepts remain accurate and complete in the new cultural context. If some notions require additional clarification in Chinese, please provide footnotes or annotations accordingly.”
多語種摘要與關鍵詞#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名在多語種學術發表領域有豐富經驗的翻譯專家，請幫助我為以下論文撰寫中英雙語（或其他目標語言）摘要和關鍵詞。請確保不同語言版本的摘要在表達內容和學術要點上保持一致，並在關鍵詞中適當包含本領域常用的專業術語，以便提升檢索與引用效率。”
【English Prompt】
“As a translation specialist experienced in multilingual academic publishing, please help me compose bilingual (Chinese and English, or other target languages) abstracts and keywords for the following paper. Make sure the abstracts in both languages convey the same content and core academic points, and include commonly used technical terms in the keywords to enhance discoverability and citation potential.”
文獻總結與引用#
精準的文獻綜述和標準化的引用是學術寫作中的基礎能力。以下提示詞旨在幫助研究者快速提煉文獻核心觀點、總結參考文獻要點，同時保證引用格式的合規性。
快速文獻綜述 / 摘要提煉#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名在文獻綜述寫作方面經驗豐富的學術助理，請根據我列出的 [文獻列表 / 文章標題]，撰寫一段針對 [研究主題] 的綜合性文獻綜述。請注意：1）突出每篇文獻的主要貢獻；2）在段落之間保持邏輯銜接；3）若文獻間存在觀點衝突或互補，請適當加以說明。最終文本應控制在 [字數] 左右，並采用客觀、中立的學術語氣。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced academic assistant in literature review writing, please produce a concise literature review paragraph on [Research Topic] based on the [list of references/article titles] I have provided. Make sure to: (1) highlight the key contributions of each source; (2) maintain logical flow between paragraphs; and (3) note any conflicting or complementary perspectives among the studies. Keep the final text within [word count] and use an objective, neutral academic tone.”
引用格式與參考文獻管理#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名熟悉多種學術引用風格（如 APA、Harvard、Chicago）的論文排版專家，請幫助我檢查以下文檔中所有參考文獻的格式是否與 [指定風格] 相匹配，並統一引用方式（如文內標註、腳註或尾註）。若發現格式錯誤或缺失信息（作者、年份、期刊名等），請給出修正示例；若引用風格有特殊要求（如頁碼範圍、DOI 標註），也請一並說明。”
【English Prompt】
“As a paper formatting expert proficient in various citation styles (e.g., APA, Harvard, Chicago), please help me verify whether all references in the following document conform to the [specified style], and standardize the citation approach (in-text citation, footnotes, or endnotes). If you detect any format errors or missing details (authors, year, journal title, etc.), provide corrected examples. Also mention any special requirements for this citation style, such as page ranges or DOIs.”
參考文獻的批判性評述#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名注重批判性思維的學術寫作指導，請對以下參考文獻列表進行批判性評述。除列出每篇文獻的核心發現或觀點外，請指出其可能的研究局限或方法學不足，並建議如何在當前研究中借鑒或改進這些局限。請在行文中保持學術客觀性，避免主觀化或情緒化的評價，並提供簡要的引用出處或備註。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic writing mentor emphasizing critical thinking, please critique the following list of references. In addition to summarizing the key findings or perspectives from each source, identify any potential limitations or methodological gaps and suggest ways these shortcomings can be addressed or improved in the current research. Maintain academic objectivity and avoid subjective or emotional language, providing brief citations or notes where relevant.”
論文結構與組織#
論文的整體結構與組織不僅影響讀者的閱讀體驗，也直接關係到研究邏輯的呈現效果。以下提示詞可幫助研究者在章節安排、段落佈局和標題選取上更具條理性和說服力。
章節框架與邏輯過渡#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名經驗豐富的學術論文設計顧問，請幫助我根據以下研究主題或大綱，規劃出一套合理的章節框架，包括每個章節的標題、目的和主要內容，並說明如何在章節之間實現順暢的邏輯過渡。若發現研究流程或信息組織存在缺口，請提出補充或調整方案，使論文結構更緊湊、易於讀者理解。”
【English Prompt】
“As an experienced consultant in academic paper design, please help me develop a coherent chapter framework based on the following research topic or outline. Provide section headings, objectives, and main points for each chapter, and explain how to maintain logical transitions between sections. If any gaps or inconsistencies appear in the research process or information organization, suggest ways to fill or rearrange them to create a more cohesive and reader-friendly structure.”
標題與小節設計#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一名擅長精煉與聚焦主題的學術編輯，請在審閱以下論文內容時，為主要章節或小節設計更精確、有吸引力的標題，確保標題能概括段落核心要點並與整體研究目標相一致。若有必要，也可在小節內部增設合乎邏輯的子標題，用來區分不同的論點或分析層次，並簡要說明這樣做的理由。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic editor skilled in concise and topic-focused writing, please review the following paper content and propose more precise, engaging headings for the main chapters or sections. Ensure that each heading accurately reflects the core point of the corresponding paragraph and aligns with the study’s overall aims. If needed, introduce logical subheadings within a section to differentiate various arguments or analytical levels, explaining why such changes would be beneficial.”
摘要與結論的銜接#
【中文 Prompt】
“作為一位熟悉論文整體結構安排的學術寫作顧問，請幫助我檢查以下論文的摘要和結論部分是否存在銜接不良或信息重複的問題。若發現摘要中未充分體現論文的關鍵結論或創新點，請提出補充要點；若結論部分缺乏與摘要的呼應或缺少對研究意義的進一步闡述，也請給出修正建議，以實現兩者之間的自然呼應。”
【English Prompt】
“As an academic writing consultant experienced in overall paper organization, please examine whether the abstract and conclusion sections of the following manuscript exhibit any mismatches or redundant information. If the abstract doesn’t adequately highlight the paper’s key findings or novel contributions, suggest additional points to include. If the conclusion lacks alignment with the abstract or fails to elaborate on the significance of the research, recommend revisions to ensure a coherent linkage between the two.”
四、小結#
在本指南中，我們系統梳理了生成式人工智慧（如 GPT）在學術寫作各個環節中可能發揮的作用及其相應的提示詞。從基礎的語法與風格潤色到更高階的同行評審輔助與編輯反饋優化，再到涵蓋翻譯、文獻管理、論文結構等常見高頻需求，整合後的提示詞不僅有助於研究者快速實現文本的語言精修，也能在評審與投稿流程中高效產出專業、建設性的意見。通過分章、分節的方式，讀者可以依據自身寫作與審稿的進度，迅速找到所需的指令，結合多輪迭代與反饋，獲得更貼近實際需求的輸出。
需要強調的是，AI 工具的應用應與研究者的批判性思維相輔相成。無論是潤色文本、審閱論文還是撰寫編輯信件，都離不開對學術倫理與嚴謹性的堅持。在享受技術帶來的便捷時，務必牢記保持學術誠信、尊重隱私與數據安全，並對生成的內容進行必要的人工審校。只有在這樣理性且謹慎的使用模式下，才能真正釋放 GPT 在學術寫作中的潛力，為研究成果的傳播與深化提供持續的驅動力。